ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Assessment of reusable textiles in the operating room under the aspect of sustainability].
Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWaste management in hospitals is an important factor with respect to environmental sustainability. Surgical waste disposal causes substantial CO
objectiveAssessment of reusable textiles in terms of waste generation, operational processes and staff acceptance. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis prospective observational study compared waste generation when using disposable or reusable drapes in 272 orthopedic and trauma operations over periods of 2 weeks each. Waste volume and weight as well as preparation, clean-up and surgery times were recorded and statistically analyzed. Surgical staff were then asked about their experiences with reusable textiles. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The use of disposable drapes resulted in 93.59l (± 75.16l) and 5.32kg (± 2.04kg) of hospital-specific waste per operation. The introduction of reusable drapes reduced waste volume by 40% and weight by 34% (p < 0.001) without affecting preparation, clean-up or surgical time. Of the staff 96% considered the use of reusable textiles to be unproblematic. The use of reusable textiles significantly reduces waste in operating rooms without affecting workflows and is supported by operating room staff. The implementation represents a practical and effective measure towards greater sustainability in operating rooms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42517894What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.