Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42518229›Full record

ReviewIntegrative and comparative biology2026

Sexes Are Polymorphisms: Describing and Understanding Sexual Diversity as Phenotypic Variation.

Jay Jinsing Falk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative and comparative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jay Jinsing FalkCenter for Animal Behavior, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Ancón 0843-03092, Republic of Panama.ORCID 0000-0001-5809-575X

Funding

National Science Foundation 2209192Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent discussion has emphasized the need for more precise frameworks for describing sex. Sexes are a type of within-species phenotypic variation, and treating them as such offers a valuable perspective across levels of scientific inquiry. I propose that phenotypic polymorphism-the presence of distinct morphs within a species-provides an especially relevant framework for studying sexes as a form of variation. Although sexes are themselves a type of polymorphism, they are rarely described in these terms. Drawing on examples from diverse taxa, I demonstrate that the mechanisms underlying the production and adaptive maintenance of polymorphisms are the same as those that produce sexes. No genetic, developmental, or evolutionary principle distinguishes sexes from other polymorphisms. I further highlight cases in which polymorphisms play as central a role to reproduction as sexes, underscoring how a polymorphism-based approach can capture the diversity of reproductive strategies while improving conceptual frameworks. By treating sexes as a form of phenotypic variation, the polymorphism perspective clarifies that sexes are a population-level trait, and that existing tools for analyzing variation within and across species can be used for a more descriptive and empirical understanding of reproductive types and their evolution.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPhenotypePolymorphism, GeneticSex CharacteristicsAnimalsFemaleReproduction

Identifiers

PMID42518229
PMCPMC13548847

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.