ReviewIntegrative and comparative biology2026
Sexes Are Polymorphisms: Describing and Understanding Sexual Diversity as Phenotypic Variation.
Review in Integrative and comparative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution, Development, and the Incoherence of Sex: A Framework for Multiple Sex Concepts.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
- Hermaphrodite, Gonochorist, and More: Navigating the Complexities of Sex-Related Language in Biology.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Review
- Synthesizing Sex/es Across Scales and Lineages: Centering Plants, Algae, Fungi, Protists, and Modular Metazoans.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
- Teaching Accurate Sex-related Biology: Approaches for More Socially Just Instruction.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Recent discussion has emphasized the need for more precise frameworks for describing sex. Sexes are a type of within-species phenotypic variation, and treating them as such offers a valuable perspective across levels of scientific inquiry. I propose that phenotypic polymorphism-the presence of distinct morphs within a species-provides an especially relevant framework for studying sexes as a form of variation. Although sexes are themselves a type of polymorphism, they are rarely described in these terms. Drawing on examples from diverse taxa, I demonstrate that the mechanisms underlying the production and adaptive maintenance of polymorphisms are the same as those that produce sexes. No genetic, developmental, or evolutionary principle distinguishes sexes from other polymorphisms. I further highlight cases in which polymorphisms play as central a role to reproduction as sexes, underscoring how a polymorphism-based approach can capture the diversity of reproductive strategies while improving conceptual frameworks. By treating sexes as a form of phenotypic variation, the polymorphism perspective clarifies that sexes are a population-level trait, and that existing tools for analyzing variation within and across species can be used for a more descriptive and empirical understanding of reproductive types and their evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.