Observational studyFrontiers in public health2026
Evaluation of the effectiveness of the model of family participatory care based on cloud follow-up in enhancing the quality of life and psychological well-being of patients with chronic difficult-to-heal traumatic tumours.
Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with chronic difficult-to-heal traumatic tumours are prone to comorbid anxiety and depression. The clinical application of the cloud-based family engagement care model for these tumours remains under intensive investigation. Objective: This study sought to explore the impacts of the cloud-based family engagement care model on quality of life and mental health outcomes among patients with chronic difficult-to-heal traumatic tumours. Methods: This is a retrospective observational controlled study. Data were collected from 60 patients diagnosed with chronic difficult-to-heal traumatic tumours who were admitted to our institution between January 2023 and December 2024. Participants were stratified into the usual care group (receiving standard clinical care) and the cloud-based family engagement care group (undergoing cloud-facilitated follow-up integrated with family-participated care). After propensity score matching (PSM), 25 patients were included in each group. Primary outcome measures encompassed total scores of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and pain intensity evaluated via the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores, wound healing duration, wound contraction rate, exudate severity, odor intensity, and sleep quality. Results: Following PSM, the baseline characteristics of the two groups were balanced and comparable (all P>0.05). Patients in the cloud-based family engagement care group demonstrated substantially better performance in quality of life-related indicators, and wound contraction rate compared with those in the usual care group (all P<0.05). Additionally, the cloud-based family engagement care group exhibited notably lower HADS anxiety scores, HADS depression scores, VAS pain scores, shorter wound healing time, milder wound exudate, less prominent wound odor, and improved sleep quality relative to the usual care group (all P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with usual care, the cloud-based family engagement care model significantly improves quality of life and mental health in these patients, showing great potential for clinical application and promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.