ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Parental perspectives on brain health education for primary school-aged children: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Up to 45% of dementia risk is considered modifiable across the life course. Research demonstrates that exposure to education in childhood can increase positive brain health outcomes in later life. While mid- and late-life educational interventions have been extensively studied, there is limited empirical evidence examining the appropriateness of education programs, including prevention approaches initiated in childhood, particularly those delivered through schools and supported by families. Understanding parental perspectives provides insights into how early-life brain health programs can be implemented. This study explored parental views and willingness to engage in primary school-based brain health educational programs and identified perceived barriers, facilitators, and preferred program components. Methods: Urban and suburban parents ( Results: Most participants endorsed brain health education for their primary school-aged children (83%), with all perceiving a prospective program as useful for their children (100%) and almost all for themselves as parents (99.5%). Higher program endorsement was associated with fewer perceived barriers and greater perceived usefulness for child development and parenting practices ( Conclusion: Parents strongly valued education on brain-healthy behaviors and described childhood as a promising window for dementia risk reduction for their children. Future programs should be comprehensive, engaging and tailored, with explicit strategies to connect school-based learning into the home. These findings contribute to the growing life-course risk reduction agenda.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.