ReviewBioactive materials2026
Biomaterials at the interface of bone-derived factors and inter-organ communication: Current evidence and future perspectives.
Review in Bioactive materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone is increasingly recognized not as a passive structural scaffold but as a dynamic endocrine organ that secretes a diverse repertoire of bone-derived factors (BDFs) which establish communication axes with the brain, kidney, cardiovascular system, immune network and metabolic organs. Harnessing this endocrine potential for therapy requires technologies that interface with skeletal secretory programs with spatial, temporal and biological precision. Bioactive materials have emerged as a promising platform for this purpose. However, complete examples demonstrating that biomaterials regulate distant organ function through clearly defined BDF-dependent mechanisms remain limited; therefore, this Review discusses biomaterial-based intervention as an emerging framework built on current evidence from local skeletal repair, BDF-related marker regulation and controlled release studies. Concurrently, artificial intelligence may assist osteokine discovery, guiding biomaterial design and enabling patient-specific digital twins of bone-organ axis dynamics. This Review synthesizes current understanding of BDF-mediated inter-organ communication, critically evaluates biomaterial strategies and clinical lessons from BDF-related therapeutics, and proposes a framework for developing biomaterials at the interface of skeletal endocrine regulation and inter-organ communication, with attention to validation requirements, translational safety and off-target systemic effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.