Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42518771›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

What's next for osteoarthritis gene therapy?

Christopher H Evans, Steven C Ghivizzani, Annahita Keravala, Thomas W Chalberg, Paul D Robbins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher H EvansMusculoskeletal Gene Therapy Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Steven C GhivizzaniDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Florida School of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Annahita KeravalaGenascence Corp., Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Thomas W ChalbergGenascence Corp., Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Paul D RobbinsDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in using gene therapy to treat osteoarthritis (OA) is growing and a number of clinical trials have been initiated. This commentary identifies three intersecting areas that need to be addressed for the field to move forward expeditiously. The first relates to lowering the cost of manufacturing clinical grade viral vectors, addressing various aspects of their deployment, and overcoming immune barriers to dosing and re-dosing. The second area requires an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of OA, including its stratification by endotype and phenotype. Coupled to the development of reliable biomarkers, this will enable the creation of personalized gene therapies, facilitate patient selection, and aid the identification of additional molecular targets. Moreover, progress in the early diagnosis of OA will enable administration of gene therapeutics at a stage when they are most likely to be successful. Finally, important issues with regard to financing and regulation are discussed. Top line data from two pivotal Phase III clinical trials are expected to be released this year. The findings from these trials will exercise considerable influence on the future development of the field.

Indexed as

arthritisbiological therapyclincial trialsintra-articular (IA) deliveryresearch translationviral vector

Identifiers

PMID42518771
PMCPMC13381445

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.