ArticleJournal of the Saudi Heart Association2026
CT-derived Epicardial Adipose Tissue Density and Its Association With Systemic Inflammation and Functional Impairment in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Prospective Cross-sectional Study From Oman.
Article in Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is strongly influenced by cardiometabolic comorbidity and systemic inflammation. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is a biologically active visceral fat depot in direct contact with the myocardium, and CT-derived EAT density (attenuation) may reflect inflammatory adipose remodeling beyond adipose quantity alone. However, the clinical relevance of EAT density in HFpEF remains uncertain. Objectives: To evaluate the association of CT-derived EAT density with systemic inflammatory biomarkers, functional capacity, health status, and echocardiographic indices of HFpEF severity in a prospective cross-sectional cohort. Methods: In a prospective cross-sectional study conducted between January and July 2024 at a tertiary cardiac center in Oman, consecutive patients with HFpEF underwent non-contrast ECG-gated cardiac CT for EAT assessment, laboratory profiling including inflammatory biomarkers, transthoracic echocardiography, 6-min walk testing (6MWT), and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) evaluation. EAT density was analyzed both as a continuous variable and in exploratory categorical analyses. Associations were examined using correlation analyses and multivariable linear regression with adjustment for clinically relevant covariates. Results: Among 110 participants (mean age 65 ± 10 years; 53% women), mean EAT density was -85 ± 10 HU. Higher EAT density was associated with higher hs-CRP (r = 0.50, p < 0.001), IL-6 (r = 0.48, p < 0.001), and TNF-α (r = 0.46, p < 0.001). Higher EAT density was associated with higher hs-CRP (r = 0.50, p < 0.001), IL-6 (r = 0.48, p < 0.001), and TNF-α (r = 0.46, p < 0.001). In exploratory adjusted analyses incorporating natriuretic peptide burden, renal function, and other clinically relevant covariates, these associations were attenuated but remained directionally consistent. Patients with higher EAT density showed lower 6MWT distance (320 ± 75 vs 400 ± 70 m, p < 0.001) and lower KCCQ overall score (60 ± 12 vs 75 ± 10, p < 0.001). These findings should be interpreted cautiously pending fuller adjustment for HF severity, renal function, and treatment-related covariates. Conclusions: In this HFpEF cohort, higher CT-derived EAT density was associated with greater inflammatory burden and worse functional status. These findings suggest that EAT density may serve as an imaging correlate of the cardiometabolic-inflammatory HFpEF phenotype, although further validation is required before broader clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.