ReviewCureus2026
Efficacy and Safety of SGLT2 Inhibitors and Sotagliflozin in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 59 Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have become a cornerstone of heart failure (HF) therapy, yet the totality of randomized evidence - including smaller trials beyond the landmark cardiovascular (CV) outcome studies - has not been comprehensively synthesized. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) from inception to March 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any SGLT2 inhibitor or the dual sodium-glucose cotransporter-1/2 (SGLT1/SGLT2) inhibitor sotagliflozin with placebo or standard care in adults with HF. Random-effects Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RRs) with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) confidence intervals (CIs) were used. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The protocol was prospectively registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD420251167908). Of 6,239 records identified, 114 studies met inclusion criteria and 59 RCTs (29,692 participants) were included in the quantitative synthesis. SGLT2 inhibitors reduced all-cause mortality (ACM; RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98; p = 0.016; 26 trials; low certainty), although trim-and-fill adjustment for publication bias attenuated the finding (adjusted RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84-1.00). HF hospitalization (HFH) was reduced (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.69-0.79; 15 trials; moderate certainty), as were CV death (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76-0.98; seven trials; moderate certainty), the composite of CV death and HFH (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.75-0.85; eight trials; high certainty), and serious adverse events (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.99; 20 trials; high certainty). Genital infections were significantly increased (RR 3.75, 95% CI 1.72-8.19); no significant increases were observed for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), acute kidney injury (AKI), urinary tract infection (UTI), or hypotension. Subgroup analyses showed a greater ACM benefit in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) than in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (interaction p = 0.039). Results were directionally consistent across 13 sensitivity scenarios and five alternative statistical models. SGLT2 inhibitors reduce HFH, CV death, the composite endpoint, and serious adverse events with moderate-to-high certainty; the all-cause mortality reduction is of low certainty and sensitive to publication bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.