Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42518906›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026

Iterating the women in pain reduction and improved mood through empowerment intervention.

Catherine Ann Clair, Natalie G Regier, Sarah L Szanton, Richard L Skolasky, Janiece L Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine Ann ClairJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Natalie G RegierJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Sarah L SzantonJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Richard L SkolaskyJohns Hopkins Medicine Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Janiece L TaylorJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To explain key adaptations made to a depression and pain intervention that addresses inequities in pain outcomes among older women. Design: The DAPPER (Depression and Pain Perseverance through Empowered Recovery) pilot study and the Women in PRIME (Pain Reduction and Improved Mood through Empowerment) study were randomized controlled trials using waitlist control designs. DAPPER focused on pain and depressive symptoms among middle-aged and older African American women who were pre-frail or frail, while Women in PRIME addressed similar symptoms among middle-aged and older women of all races living with physical disabilities. Methods: Ten DAPPER and eight Women in PRIME participants were interviewed post-intervention completion. Qualitative data for both studies was analyzed using a deductive qualitative content analysis approach. Quantitative data included descriptive statistics. Results: Seven changes were made from the DAPPER Study to the Women in PRIME Study. These changes included 1) Re-naming the intervention; 2) Adding retention practices; 3) Expanding to include women of all races; 4) Switching criterion of (pre)frailty to physical disability; 5) Adding group Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (ACT) sessions; 6) Reducing individual nurse visits from 8 to 5 visits; and 7) Switching from saliva to sweat patch for biomarker measurement. Conclusions: The changes made from DAPPER to Women in PRIME resulted in greater retention, participation in the intervention, and participation in the data collection timepoints. A critical component of equity-focused intervention iteration is ensuring that participant input and guidance directly shape the modifications and adaptations that advance the intervention toward larger scale trials.

Indexed as

depressioninterventionpainpilotrepilotingwomen

Identifiers

PMID42518906
PMCPMC13381692

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.