ReviewFrontiers in transplantation2026
A review of immunosuppressive therapy in the context of uterine VCA and pregnancy.
Review in Frontiers in transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) represents one of the latest developments in the field of transplant surgery and treatment of uterine-factor infertility. Unlike other forms of VCA, uterine transplantation involves a temporary allograft, pregnancy-associated physiologic and pharmacokinetic changes, and complex maternal-fetal immunologic interactions, creating distinct challenges in immunosuppression management. Herein, we perform a comprehensive review of the latest and relevant literature on immunosuppressive strategies in the context of VCA and pregnancy, with particular emphasis on their relevance to uterine VCA. Evidence from solid organ transplantation, autoimmune disease, and reported uterine transplant protocols was synthesized to inform stage-specific management strategies. Available data support corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, azathioprine, and hydroxychloroquine as pregnancy-compatible agents, whereas mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, and cyclophosphamide remain contraindicated due to teratogenicity. Pregnancy-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes significantly influence drug exposure and necessitate individualized dosing and close therapeutic monitoring. Emerging evidence suggests that pregnancy-associated immune modulation, including regulatory T-cell expansion and microchimerism, may reduce rejection risk, although this remains incompletely characterized. Based on best available evidence, we present a summary for immunosuppressive management spanning induction, preconception optimization, pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum graft removal. Future priorities include development of noninvasive rejection monitoring, precision pharmacokinetic modeling, and tolerance-inducing strategies to improve maternal, fetal, and allograft outcomes in uterine transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.