ArticleAnesthesiology research and practice2026
Comparison on the Effectiveness of Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine in Reducing Emergence Agitation in Adults Undergoing Otorhinolaryngology Surgery.
Article in Anesthesiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison on the Effectiveness of Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine in Reducing Emergence Agitation in Adults Undergoing Otorhinolaryngology Surgery.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emergence agitation (EA) is a phenomenon commonly occurring in otorhinolaryngology surgery. It may increase the risk of injury and prolong recovery. Dexmedetomidine is the standard preventive agent, but limited due to its high cost, limited accessibility, extubation time, and incidence of bradycardia and hypotension. Magnesium sulphate (MgSO Methods: This study is a multicentered, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial involving 64 adult patients undergoing otorhinolaryngology surgery. They were divided into two groups in a 1:1 ratio, with one group receiving MgSO Results: The proportion of EA was not significantly different between the MgSO Conclusion: Intravenous MgSO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.