Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42518969›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2026

Feasibility-First Risk Management for Clinical AI: A Deterministic Systems Intelligence Framework for Release, Monitoring, Rollback and Withholding.

Adegoke O Adefolalu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adegoke O AdefolaluPractice of Medicine and Clinical Integrated Programmes, School of Medicine, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1706-2756

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to predict deterioration, classify risk, prioritise workload, support diagnosis, tailor communication and monitor patients across healthcare settings. Existing safety discussions rightly emphasise model performance, bias, explainability, regulatory approval and post-deployment monitoring. However, these domains do not fully answer a prior risk-management question: when should an AI output be released into clinical or organisational action under the active healthcare regime? This Perspective develops a Deterministic Systems Intelligence (DSI) framework for feasibility-first clinical AI risk management. The proposed admissible-state layer evaluates candidate AI outputs against data fitness, population fit, clinical actionability, workflow capacity, equity, authority, monitoring and reversibility before action is permitted. It classifies outputs into five governance states: release, restricted release, active monitoring, rollback and HOLD. HOLD denotes disciplined non-release when evidence, feasibility or safeguards are insufficient. A worked deterioration-alert example shows how the same technically plausible output may be released, restricted, monitored, rolled back or held depending on local capacity, equity and safety controls. The framework complements reporting, audit, regulatory and algorithmovigilance approaches by inserting an explicit admissibility step between AI output and healthcare action. Responsible clinical AI therefore requires not only prediction, but release readiness, monitoring and the capacity to withhold.

Indexed as

admissible-state reasoningalgorithmovigilanceartificial intelligenceclinical decision supportdeterministic systems intelligencehealthcare risk management

Identifiers

PMID42518969
PMCPMC13384092

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.