ArticleiScience2026
Spatial trade-offs between environmental sustainability and crop production in China under SDG-aligned scenarios.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reconciling lower environmental impacts from agriculture with food security is a core national objective in China. We develop spatially explicit projections for nine major crops to 2030 and 2060 under Business-as-Usual (BAU), BAU with carbon-efficiency constraints (BAU-CE), and Sustainable Development Goal (SDG)-aligned pathway (SDG-60). Despite improved input-use efficiency, national output declines modestly by 2030 relative to 2020 (-11.4% BAU and -11.5% BAU-CE). By 2060, efficiencies approach ∼90%, with substantial reductions in aggregate inputs (fertilizer -30%, pesticides -50%, and irrigation water -34.4%). Under SDG-60, cropping greenhouse-gas emissions are ∼72% lower than under BAU-CE, while aggregate production across the nine crops declines by ∼50.5%. Spatial heterogeneity reveals trade-off zones where large mitigation gains and reduced chemical and water use coincide with output and income losses, particularly in rice-intensive provinces. Provinces with below-median labor productivity and income but above-median mitigation burdens are identified as structurally disadvantaged, highlighting where differentiated targets, incentives, and transition support are most needed to balance mitigation, food security, and rural livelihoods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.