ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2026
Best evidence summary of exercise rehabilitation in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Review in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate and summarize existing evidence regarding exercise rehabilitation for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy to inform the development of evidence-based clinical practice. Methods: According to the "6S" evidence pyramid model, evidence on exercise rehabilitation in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy was retrieved, including clinical decisions, guidelines, evidence summaries, best practices and recommended practices, expert consensus, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and high-quality randomized controlled trials. Searches covered major domestic and international databases as well as professional websites, with literature collected up to 8 January 2026. Two independent researchers evaluated the quality of the literature and extracted and summarized the included evidence. Results: A total of 15 articles were selected, including one clinical decision, four guidelines, one expert consensus, three systematic reviews and six randomized controlled trials. Thirty-five pieces of evidence were summarized in nine areas: exercise purpose, multidisciplinary team formulation, health education, exercise assessment, exercise preparation, exercise timing, exercise type, exercise parameters, and exercise supervision. Conclusions: This study summarizes the latest evidence on exercise rehabilitation for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, while emphasizing the cautious use of extrapolated evidence when pancreaticoduodenectomy-specific data are lacking. Prior to applying the evidence, specific safety issues for these patients should be fully considered, and interventions should be tailored to individual needs and preferences. Future research should prioritize high-quality randomized controlled trials on exercise rehabilitation in this population to generate direct evidence and thereby refine exercise rehabilitation programs. Systematic review registration: This study was registered at the Fudan University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing (Registration No. ES20244076).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.