ReviewAddictive behaviors reports2026
Effectiveness of brief motivational interviewing for alcohol misuse: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Addictive behaviors reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alcohol misuse remains a major global public health concern. Brief motivational interviewing (BMI) is a time-efficient, patient-centered intervention for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol use. Methods: This systematic review synthesized evidence from 32 randomized controlled trials published between 2015 and 2025 evaluating BMI interventions for alcohol misuse in adults. Studies involving university students, emergency department patients, individuals with psychiatric or medical comorbidities, and socially vulnerable populations were included. Results: BMI was generally associated with reductions in alcohol consumption, binge drinking frequency, heavy drinking days, alcohol-related consequences, and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) scores. Effects were more consistently observed among university students and emergency department populations, whereas findings were more variable among individuals with psychiatric comorbidity or social vulnerability. Technology-assisted and hybrid BMI approaches demonstrated short-term effectiveness comparable to traditional face-to-face delivery, although intervention effects frequently attenuated beyond 6-12 months. Conclusions: BMI appears to be a flexible and clinically meaningful intervention for reducing alcohol-related harm across diverse adult populations. However, long-term benefits were less consistently maintained, suggesting that ongoing support strategies, such as booster contacts, digital monitoring, or continued clinician involvement, may be important for sustaining behavioral change over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.