ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The bidirectional relationship between emotional distress and subjective wellbeing among college students: a cross-lagged network analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study examined the bidirectional relationship between subjective wellbeing (SWB) and emotional distress (ED) among college students from a network perspective. It aimed to identify the cross-sectional network structure at two time points, identify the most central nodes, and explore bidirectional pathways between the two domains using cross-lagged network analysis. Methods: A two-wave longitudinal survey was conducted among college students from six universities in Jiangxi, Guizhou, and Jiangsu Provinces, China. Data were collected in December 2024 and December 2025 through the Wenjuanxing online platform. After screening and matching across waves, 1,354 students were retained for analysis. SWB was measured with the Index of Wellbeing Scale, and ED was measured with the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21. Cross-sectional networks were estimated at both time points, and a cross-lagged panel network model was used to examine cross-lagged relations over time. Results: The T1 and T2 networks had densities of 0.522 and 0.554, featuring predominantly positive within-domain and negative between-domain edges. At T1, "Life was meaningless" showed the highest strength, whereas at T2, "Hopeful" showed the highest strength. The cross-lagged network showed longitudinal predictive associations between SWB and ED from T1 to T2. Hopeful showed the strongest out-expected influence, 3.24, whereas Satisfied showed the strongest in-expected influence, 2.31. Network stability analysis supported the robustness of the centrality estimates. Conclusion: Network analysis revealed interconnected networks of SWB and ED among college students at both cross-sectional and longitudinal levels. The longitudinal findings indicate bidirectional predictive associations across a 1-year interval. These results highlight the value of a symptom-level approach and suggest that Hopeful and Satisfied may be informative nodes for future research on the temporal associations between positive and negative aspects of mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.