Evidence mapPaperPMID 42519599Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Comprehensive evaluation of biostimulants on leaf-level physiology, water use efficiency, and tuber quality in potato (

Muhammad Ahsan Asghar, Karen la Cour Jørgensen, Thayná Mendanha Dos Santos, Hanne Lakkenborg Kristensen, Merete Edelenbos, Mesfin Tsegaye Gebremikael

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad Ahsan AsgharDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Agro Food Park, Aarhus, Denmark.
Karen la Cour JørgensenDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Agro Food Park, Aarhus, Denmark.
Thayná Mendanha Dos SantosDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Agro Food Park, Aarhus, Denmark.
Hanne Lakkenborg KristensenDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Agro Food Park, Aarhus, Denmark.
Merete EdelenbosDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Agro Food Park, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mesfin Tsegaye GebremikaelDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Agro Food Park, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pressing need for sustainable agriculture and food security has led to increased interest in biostimulants (BS) to mitigate abiotic stresses such as drought. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of five commercial BS (Vesta, Humifirst, Acadian, SilicaPower, and Crop-Set) on leaf-level physiology, water use efficiency (WUE), tuber yield, and tuber quality in potato under drought stress. Drought stress was applied at the onset of tuber initiation (51 days after planting) and lasted for 7 days followed by a 4-day recovery period. Drought stress significantly decreased leaf relative water content, photosynthetic parameters, and flavonol index compared to non-drought. The yield and glucose content were 26% and 21% lower, and the sucrose content was 59% higher in the tubers of the drought-stressed plants than in non-drought-stressed. BS effects were generally limited and dependent on water conditions, with significant interactions observed for WUE parameters. Under drought conditions, Vesta and SilicaPower increased intrinsic WUE by 36% and 30%, respectively, while instantaneous WUE increased by 25% with both Vesta and Humifirst and by 33% with SilicaPower. Under non-drought conditions, Acadian led to a 42% increase in intrinsic WUE and a 60% increase in instantaneous WUE. However, these effects were not consistently accompanied by improvements in photosynthesis, biomass, or yield. Overall, this comprehensive assessment indicates that tested BS exert limited effects on potato plant biomass and tubers yield under drought stress, with their primary influence restricted to increased leaf-level WUE and changes in tuber composition rather than providing broad drought stress alleviation at whole plant level.

Indexed as

biomassbiostimulantsdroughtmorphologyphotosynthesistuber quality

Identifiers

PMID42519599
PMCPMC13381200

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.