Evidence mapPaperPMID 42520072Full record

ReviewPLOS digital health2026

Toward universal representations of the living: Physiological invariance for transportable medical AI.

Alexandre Vallée

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexandre ValléeDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9158-4467

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical artificial intelligence (AI) models often degrade when deployed beyond their training environment, suggesting reliance on context-specific correlations rather than stable physiological structure. This article considers whether improved transportability may require representation learning strategies aligned with biological mechanisms expected to persist across populations, devices, and care pathways. Physiological invariance is introduced as the hypothesis that outcome-relevant predictive relationships may be mediated by latent physiological processes that are more stable across environments than observed measurements shaped by workflows or data acquisition. Multimodal self-supervised learning combined with mechanism-informed regularization may help identify such environment-stable structure, although empirical validation remains limited. Physiological invariance is not proposed as a sufficient or necessary condition for generalization, but as a candidate structural explanation for transportability in domains where shared biological mechanisms exist.

Identifiers

PMID42520072
PMCPMC13412061

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.