Trial reportPloS one2026
Feasibility of the Italian version of the Teen Online Problem Solving Program (I-TOPS) in a sample of adolescents with acquired brain injury: Results from a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05169788 (Rehabilitation of Executive Functions and Social Skills in Adolescents With Neurological Condition by Using the Italian Version of the Teen Online Problem-Solving), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Rehabilitation of Executive Functions and Social Skills in Adolescents With Neurological Condition by Using the Italian Version of the Teen Online Problem-Solving (TOPS) Program
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous neurocognitive and behavioral deficits in adolescents with acquired brain injury have been associated with impairments in executive functions. Nevertheless, many adolescents do not receive targeted rehabilitation. One of the most validated interventions addressing executive dysfunction in this population is the web-based Teen Online Problem Solving (TOPS) program, developed in the United States in the early 2000s. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the Italian version of TOPS (I-TOPS) in its first implementation in Italy, compared with an active control wellness intervention in adolescents aged 11-19 years. Data on the feasibility of both the training and the study design and procedures are reported from the randomized controlled trial conducted to assess feasibility prior to a full evaluation of efficacy. Forty-two adolescents participated, 21 allocated to I-TOPS and 21 to the wellness intervention. Overall willingness to participate in the study, assessed before randomization across the full sample, was moderate (61.73%). The I-TOPS group, but not the wellness group, demonstrated adequate training adherence, training satisfaction and participation rates. No technological issues hindering program completion, accessibility difficulties with the web-based platform or significant loss to follow-up among participants who completed the training were reported in either group. However, challenges in collecting outcome measures on parent functioning due to refusal were observed in both groups. Adherence to the planned assessment timeline was satisfactory but not fully met. In sum, the findings suggest that I-TOPS represents a feasible approach that is subjectively perceived as useful and engaging by adolescents with acquired brain injury and their families. Nevertheless, the moderate acceptance rate in the study and the potential stigma associated with reporting mental health concerns among some parents may limit the generalizability of the findings. These factors should be taken into account when planning efficacy studies. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05169788).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.