ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
A Large Language Model-Driven System for Advance Care Planning Training Among Health Care Providers in the Chinese Context: Development and Technical Evaluation.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the expanding need for advance care planning (ACP), innovative educational strategies for training health care providers are increasingly required. Large language model (LLM)-based ACP chatbots offer a novel and potentially effective solution to enhance health care providers' competence in navigating complex ACP conversations. Objective: This study aimed to develop a Chinese-context ACP corpus to support an LLM-based chatbot and evaluate the feasibility and performance of a multi-agent system for simulating complex ACP discussions as a training tool for health care providers. Methods: This study involved dataset construction and model adaptation and evaluation. We constructed 3 structured datasets using synthetic dialogue data generated through prompts derived from ACP-related scientific literature and policy documents. Both open-source (Zhongjing) and closed-source LLMs (GPT-4o-mini) were chosen as baseline models. The Zhongjing model was adapted through fine-tuning, whereas GPT-4o-mini was adapted using both fine-tuning and prompt engineering. Model performance was assessed through automatic and human evaluations following the QUEST (Quality of information, Understanding and reasoning, Expression style and persona, Safety and harm, and Trust and confidence) framework. Statistical comparisons between baseline and adapted models were performed using repeated-measures ANOVA. Results: Three separate datasets for the assistant, vignette, and evaluator agents were created, which collectively formed a multi-agent artificial intelligence system for Chinese ACP training. The assistant dataset included 4364 dialogues, the vignette dataset comprised 671 clinical scenarios, and the evaluator dataset contained 671 records. Both automatic and human evaluations confirmed that the adapted models significantly outperformed baseline models on most aspects of Chinese ACP conversations and summarization (η2p=0.12-0.99; P values ranged from .03 to <.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the adequate technical feasibility of the multi-agent LLM-based system for ACP training among health care providers in the Chinese context. Despite its potential as a supportive educational tool, further validation in real-world training contexts is required to establish its effectiveness in enhancing health care providers' ACP competencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.