Evidence mapPaperPMID 42520300Full record

ArticleAnimal models and experimental medicine2026

Analysis of energy expenditure and behavioral characteristics in different mouse strains under normal and disease conditions.

Jiacheng Zeng, Yuanjun Ji, Yan Zou, Jing Tan, Teng Wu, Conghui Shen, Tongsheng Huang, Shijie Xiong, Mengying Liu, Maoquan Yang and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jiacheng ZengGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yuanjun JiGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yan ZouGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jing TanGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Teng WuGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Conghui ShenGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Tongsheng HuangGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shijie XiongGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Mengying LiuGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Maoquan YangGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jingwei LaiGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jiangwei MaGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Junhong WanGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xinlu FuGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jiang QianGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Hui LiGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ludong YuanGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Weibin CaiGuangdong Engineering & Technology Research Center for Disease-Model Animals, Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

Guangdong Special Support Program for Health and Medical Talents 0820250101National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFF0724900National Natural Science Foundation of China 81970219National Natural Science Foundation of China 82170261National Natural Science Foundation of China 82200289National Natural Science Foundation of China 82370283National Natural Science Foundation of China 82500352National Natural Science Foundation of China 82570338the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2025A1515010845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetabolic and behavioral traits in mice exhibit substantial variability across strains, ages, and disease states, which can confound preclinical study outcomes. However, systematic characterization of these parameters (e.g., energy metabolism, activity, and feeding behavior) across diverse experimental conditions remains limited.

methodsCore metabolic and behavioral parameters were assessed via metabolic cages in five 8-week-old mouse strains (ICR, C57BL/6J, BALB/c, BALB/c-nude, NOD-SCID), six C57BL/6J age groups (3 weeks to 18 months), and four mouse disease models (LPS-induced pneumonia, chronic kidney disease, acute myocardial infarction, and type 1 diabetes). Data were stratified by light/dark cycles and statistically compared.

resultsHerein, metabolic and behavioral phenotypes of mice were systematically characterized across different strains, ages, and four disease models (three organ-specific, one systemic). Distinct strain- and age-related differences in basal metabolism, activity, and energy expenditure were observed. Specifically, ICR mice displayed higher basal aerobic metabolism, whereas C57BL/6J mice exhibited greater locomotor activity; metabolism and energy balance also underwent marked shifts during development, pregnancy, and aging. Furthermore, all disease models presented unique metabolic rearrangements: LPS-induced acute pneumonia reduced aerobic metabolism and locomotor activity; CKD caused hypometabolism, polydipsia, and a substrate shift to carbohydrate oxidation; AMI increased respiratory exchange ratio (RER) and water intake; and T1DM induced polyphagia and polydipsia, with normal metabolism but impaired energy utilization.

conclusionsMouse metabolic and behavioral phenotypes are highly dependent on strain, age, and disease state. These findings highlight the need to standardize experimental conditions (e.g., age, strain, disease state) and account for baseline variability when designing preclinical studies.

Indexed as

disease modelmetabolic cagesmetabolic phenotypemousestrain difference

Identifiers

PMID42520300
PMCPMC13412605

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.