ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Beyond fixation: persistent genetic variation under intense selection.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how and why genetic variation is maintained under sustained selection remains a central question in evolutionary genetics. Experimental evolution shows that adaptation in sexually reproducing populations is often highly polygenic, proceeding through coordinated, genome-wide allele frequency shifts from standing variation rather than classic hard sweeps. Recent explanations emphasize highly polygenic architectures, optimizing-selection, and genetic redundancy, which can slow fixation by distributing selection across many loci during adaptation. However, observations from long-term selection experiments reveal a pattern these frameworks do not fully explain: substantial genetic variation persists after hundreds of generations of intense directional selection in constant environments. Here, we use long-term experimental evolution in Drosophila melanogaster to test whether balancing-selection actively maintains genetic variation under strong life-history selection and preserves evolutionary reversibility. Longstanding populations selected for accelerated or delayed reproduction were shifted to the opposing regime, imposing age-structured fitness trade-offs. Notably, selection for early reproduction is associated with substantial loss of genetic variation, providing a stringent test of whether standing variation is truly depleted. Following reciprocal shifts, populations showed rapid phenotypic convergence toward the target regime. At the genomic level, allele-frequency trajectories were strongly antiparallel and highly repeatable across replicates, revealing coordinated polygenic responses. Reversing long-standing early-life selection produced a pronounced rebound in genome-wide heterozygosity. Deep sequencing uncovered ultra-rare alleles at sites appearing fixed under standard coverage, indicating low-frequency functional variation persists below detection thresholds. These results suggest that substantial genetic variation can persist under intense directional selection and be rapidly redeployed when selection reverses, consistent with widespread balancing-selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.