ArticleJournal of substance use and addiction treatment2026
Longitudinal engagement and drinking outcomes associated with mode of 12-step attendance.
Article in Journal of substance use and addiction treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction12-step programs have demonstrated efficacy, and evidence suggests that online 12-step meeting attendance has become an established pathway to the 12-step program, both as a sole point of access and in combination with in-person attendance. Because the relative effectiveness of these two modes of 12-step attendance have yet to be compared clinicians have little empirical guidance in making referrals to either in-person or online 12-step meetings. This study contrasts online versus both online and in-person attendance and experiences among early 12-step affiliates. Three domains central to the 12-step program were compared: engagement in prescribed behaviors, impressions of 12-step group dynamics, and drinking outcome.
methodThis was an observational longitudinal study (N = 192) examining the change trajectories of early 12-step members. Participants were recruited via online platforms and selection criteria restricted enrollment to individuals with limited AA histories. Assessments for the entire sample included online interviews at baseline, 3, and 6-months and a subset of the sample also completed twice daily EMA online surveys for 6-months (n = 133). The EMA sample constituted the sample for this study and, of the 133 EMA participants, 110 were classified by 12-step attendance mode.
resultsDemographic profiles did not differ between adults attending only online meetings (n = 40) versus attending both online and in-person meetings (n = 70), with the exception that attending both 12-step modes was associated with pre-baseline treatment episodes. Rates of 12-step attendance were equivalent over 3-months between 12-step modes although online only participants reported less engagement in prescribed activities, and they reported significantly lower agreement on the tasks and objectives of the 12-step program. Rates of abstinence (baseline to 3-months) were significantly higher when attending both 12-step modes (94.51%; SD = 17.24) relative to only online meetings (81.44%; SD = 17.38). No between-group differences were found on measures of drinking intensity and negative consequences.
conclusionOnline 12-step meeting attendance is a popular method to access the 12-step program. While online meetings offer enhanced accessibility the exclusive use of online meetings was associated with less engagement in prescribed 12-step activities and lower rates of abstinence relative to attending both online and in-person meetings. Awaiting replication, findings suggest that clinicians should recommend attending both 12-step meeting modes during early recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.