Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42521303›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2026

Novel indicator for colonoscopy insertion difficulty and its application in predictive modelling: a multicentre prospective study protocol in China.

Yue Zhang, Lijuan Wei, Xiaodong Wang, Yueli Tian, Ruifeng Duan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07228715 (A Study on a New Indicator for Assessing the Difficulty of Colonoscopy Insertion and Its Related Factors), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07228715 active not recruitingnot on this map

A Study on a New Indicator for Assessing the Difficulty of Colonoscopy Insertion and Its Related Factors

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSecond Hospital of Jilin UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled2,000Conditionsthe Difficulty of Colonoscopy Insertion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yue ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Lijuan WeiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Xiaodong WangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yueli TianDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Ruifeng DuanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China duanruifeng@jlu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-2558-4244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColonoscopy is a cornerstone for the screening and diagnosis of colorectal diseases. Colonoscopy insertion difficulty is associated with examination quality, procedural efficiency and patient comfort. Cecal intubation time (CIT) is commonly used as a surrogate measure of insertion difficulty; however, it is substantially influenced by endoscopist experience, equipment characteristics and institutional factors, limiting its objectivity and comparability. This study will develop and validate a standardised colonoscopy insertion time (SCIT) metric that better reflects patient-related procedural difficulty while minimising non-patient-related variability. Additionally, we will identify factors associated with insertion difficulty and develop predictive models using machine learning techniques. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre prospective observational study will enrol approximately 3000 adults undergoing sedated colonoscopy across one primary centre and five participating centres. CIT will be prospectively recorded and analysed in relation to patient characteristics, endoscopist experience, colonoscope type and study centre. Three standardisation approaches, including Z-score standardisation, median-based standardisation and min-max normalisation, will be applied to generate SCIT. The primary outcome will be SCIT, and the optimal standardisation method will be selected based on its ability to reduce variability attributable to operator-related, equipment-related and centre-related factors while preserving clinically meaningful associations with patient characteristics. Mixed-effects models will be used to account for clustering by endoscopist and study centre. Based on the selected SCIT metric, machine learning models will be developed using preprocedural clinical variables to predict insertion difficulty. Model performance will be evaluated using measures of discrimination, calibration and predictive accuracy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study received initial ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the Second Hospital of Jilin University (Approval No. 2024-467-1) on 4 November 2024. Subsequent protocol amendments were approved on 25 March 2026. All participants will provide written informed consent prior to enrolment. Patient privacy and data confidentiality will be strictly maintained. The results will be disseminated through SCI-indexed journals and presentations at national and international academic conferences to inform future research and clinical practice related to colonoscopy performance evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07228715.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyAdultChinaHumansMachine LearningMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicPredictive Learning ModelsProspective StudiesResearch DesignTime FactorsEndoscopyMachine LearningPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID42521303
PMCPMC13423049

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.