Observational studyBMJ open2026
Novel indicator for colonoscopy insertion difficulty and its application in predictive modelling: a multicentre prospective study protocol in China.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07228715 (A Study on a New Indicator for Assessing the Difficulty of Colonoscopy Insertion and Its Related Factors), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Study on a New Indicator for Assessing the Difficulty of Colonoscopy Insertion and Its Related Factors
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColonoscopy is a cornerstone for the screening and diagnosis of colorectal diseases. Colonoscopy insertion difficulty is associated with examination quality, procedural efficiency and patient comfort. Cecal intubation time (CIT) is commonly used as a surrogate measure of insertion difficulty; however, it is substantially influenced by endoscopist experience, equipment characteristics and institutional factors, limiting its objectivity and comparability. This study will develop and validate a standardised colonoscopy insertion time (SCIT) metric that better reflects patient-related procedural difficulty while minimising non-patient-related variability. Additionally, we will identify factors associated with insertion difficulty and develop predictive models using machine learning techniques. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre prospective observational study will enrol approximately 3000 adults undergoing sedated colonoscopy across one primary centre and five participating centres. CIT will be prospectively recorded and analysed in relation to patient characteristics, endoscopist experience, colonoscope type and study centre. Three standardisation approaches, including Z-score standardisation, median-based standardisation and min-max normalisation, will be applied to generate SCIT. The primary outcome will be SCIT, and the optimal standardisation method will be selected based on its ability to reduce variability attributable to operator-related, equipment-related and centre-related factors while preserving clinically meaningful associations with patient characteristics. Mixed-effects models will be used to account for clustering by endoscopist and study centre. Based on the selected SCIT metric, machine learning models will be developed using preprocedural clinical variables to predict insertion difficulty. Model performance will be evaluated using measures of discrimination, calibration and predictive accuracy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study received initial ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the Second Hospital of Jilin University (Approval No. 2024-467-1) on 4 November 2024. Subsequent protocol amendments were approved on 25 March 2026. All participants will provide written informed consent prior to enrolment. Patient privacy and data confidentiality will be strictly maintained. The results will be disseminated through SCI-indexed journals and presentations at national and international academic conferences to inform future research and clinical practice related to colonoscopy performance evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07228715.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.