ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2026
Promoting Planetary Health, One Bite at a Time: Examining the Efficacy and Feasibility of a Dietary Behaviour Change Intervention.
Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Promoting Planetary Health, One Bite at a Time: Examining the Efficacy and Feasibility of a Dietary Behaviour Change Intervention.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
issue addressedThe climate crisis is affecting the food system and human health, requiring a population-wide dietary shift to safeguard our future. This study examined the efficacy and feasibility of an intervention intended to increase the adoption of healthy and sustainable diet-related practices.
methodsA mixed-methods, pilot case study design was used to examine the efficacy and feasibility of the PlanEATary Quest 3-week intervention, where participants complete pre-post questionnaires and select sustainability-focused behaviour change tasks from a menu of healthy and sustainable diet-related activities. Quantitative results (pre-post survey) were analysed using a paired-sample t-test and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Qualitative data (interview transcripts) were thematically analysed deductively, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
settingNutrition and dietetic professionals employed in diverse roles (clinical, community health, food service, management and dedicated food sustainability roles) at a large Australian health service participated in the PlanEATary Quest.
resultsAnalysis of the pre-post questionnaire revealed statistically significant improvements in scores for five of 12 targeted dietary behaviours, suggesting desirable dietary shifts and knowledge gains regarding planetary health. Of the 40 intervention participants, 14 completed a follow-up interview or survey. Interview and survey data revealed several factors influencing intervention engagement: individual attitudes, workplace culture and leadership support and intervention delivery style.
conclusionsBased on examination of this pilot intervention, the PlanEATary Quest has the potential to increase the adoption of healthy and sustainable dietary behaviours. SO WHAT?: These findings highlight the potential role of workplace-based, experiential interventions in supporting behaviour change. The expansion of such interventions amongst health professionals, and potentially other audiences, may be an effective and feasible approach to support dietary shifts that benefit both human and planetary health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.