Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42521802›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Machine learning approaches to predict early cardiac immune-related adverse events in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Michael Sayer, Peter D Chang, Hirofumi Hamano, Reina Yamamoto, Misako Nagasaka, Ali A Naqvi, Pranav M Patel, Yoshito Zamami, Aya F Ozaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael SayerSchool of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Peter D ChangSchool of Medicine, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Hirofumi HamanoDepartment of Pharmacy, Medical Development Field, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Reina YamamotoDepartment of Medicinal Pharmacology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Misako NagasakaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Ali A NaqviMary & Steve Wen Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Pranav M PatelMary & Steve Wen Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Yoshito ZamamiDepartment of Pharmacy, Medical Development Field, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Aya F OzakiSchool of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. afozaki@uci.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced cardiac immune-related adverse events (cardiac irAEs) are rare yet serious complications. Clinical assessment tools to identify at-risk patients would allow for more effective prevention strategies, thus improving clinical outcomes. We constructed various machine learning (ML) models to predict these events among patients receiving ICI therapy.

methodsA cohort of patients receiving ICI therapy from 2010 to 2023 was identified from the TriNetX database. Cardiac irAEs were defined as the occurrence of relevant diagnosis codes within 90 days of ICI initiation, with corresponding hospital visits. We created ML models to predict these events, including elastic net logistic regression and multiple tree-based approaches (gradient boosted trees and random forest). We evaluated model performance with different performance measures and utilized assigned risk scores to stratify risk of cardiac irAEs into low, medium, and high-risk tiers.

resultsWe identified 61,117 patients receiving ICI therapy, with nearly 2% of patients experiencing cardiac irAEs. Model performance on testing data was comparable with all approaches (AUC = 0.71-0.72, balanced accuracy = 65-66%). Each model emphasized distinct features to make classifications, as observed with feature importance and SHAP values. Comparing cardiac irAE rates among assigned risk strata, patients identified as high risk were significantly more likely to experience cardiac irAEs compared to lower tiers.

conclusionOur preliminary exploration of ML methods demonstrated the potential for risk assessment tools to predict rare cardiac irAEs in patients receiving ICI therapy. Follow-up studies can implement time series approaches to harness longitudinal data that incorporates real-time labs, new diagnoses, and new therapy, to refine predictions further.

Indexed as

Heart DiseasesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMachine LearningAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune checkpoint inhibitorsImmune-related adverse eventsMachine learningMyocarditisPericarditisRisk assessment tools

Identifiers

PMID42521802
PMCPMC13415296

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.