ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Machine learning approaches to predict early cardiac immune-related adverse events in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced cardiac immune-related adverse events (cardiac irAEs) are rare yet serious complications. Clinical assessment tools to identify at-risk patients would allow for more effective prevention strategies, thus improving clinical outcomes. We constructed various machine learning (ML) models to predict these events among patients receiving ICI therapy.
methodsA cohort of patients receiving ICI therapy from 2010 to 2023 was identified from the TriNetX database. Cardiac irAEs were defined as the occurrence of relevant diagnosis codes within 90 days of ICI initiation, with corresponding hospital visits. We created ML models to predict these events, including elastic net logistic regression and multiple tree-based approaches (gradient boosted trees and random forest). We evaluated model performance with different performance measures and utilized assigned risk scores to stratify risk of cardiac irAEs into low, medium, and high-risk tiers.
resultsWe identified 61,117 patients receiving ICI therapy, with nearly 2% of patients experiencing cardiac irAEs. Model performance on testing data was comparable with all approaches (AUC = 0.71-0.72, balanced accuracy = 65-66%). Each model emphasized distinct features to make classifications, as observed with feature importance and SHAP values. Comparing cardiac irAE rates among assigned risk strata, patients identified as high risk were significantly more likely to experience cardiac irAEs compared to lower tiers.
conclusionOur preliminary exploration of ML methods demonstrated the potential for risk assessment tools to predict rare cardiac irAEs in patients receiving ICI therapy. Follow-up studies can implement time series approaches to harness longitudinal data that incorporates real-time labs, new diagnoses, and new therapy, to refine predictions further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.