ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Pericoronary fat radiomics on coronary CT angiography for predicting major adverse cardiac events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) reflects local coronary inflammation and microstructural changes and may predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Radiomics extracts high-dimensional features from PCAT on coronary CT angiography, capturing tissue heterogeneity beyond conventional risk factors or plaque metrics. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of PCAT radiomics for MACE prediction. MATERIALS AND
methodsPubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to October 2025. Ten retrospective studies were included. Diagnostic metrics were extracted and pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were performed by classifier, region of interest, and follow-up duration. Methodological quality and certainty of evidence were assessed.
resultsRadiomics-only models showed moderate performance (sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.74, area under the curve (AUC) 0.78). Combined models improved discrimination, with radiomics + clinical (AUC 0.80) and radiomics + imaging (sensitivity 0.89; diagnostic odds ratio (LnDOR) 2.93). Triple-combination models achieved the highest performance (AUC 0.87; LnDOR 4.05). Radiomics models showed higher AUC than clinical (ΔAUC = 0.05) and imaging models (ΔAUC = 0.18), with inconsistent sensitivity and specificity differences. Adding clinical variables provided modest improvement, whereas imaging integration yielded greater gains. Triple models showed the largest improvement (ΔAUC = 0.06; ΔLnDOR = 2.21). Mean Radiomics Quality Score was 18/36, and overall evidence certainty was moderate.
conclusionPCAT radiomics derived from CCTA shows moderate predictive performance for MACE in patients with coronary artery disease and may provide incremental value over conventional clinical and imaging models. Standardized radiomics pipelines and multicenter prospective validation are required for clinical translation. KEY POINTS: Question Can quantitative analysis of pericoronary adipose tissue on coronary computed tomography angiography improve the prediction of major adverse cardiac events beyond clinical risk factors? Findings Radiomics models showed higher AUC than clinical and imaging models, while combined models demonstrated the highest predictive performance across included studies. Clinical relevance Pericoronary adipose tissue radiomics may provide additional quantitative information on coronary inflammation and may offer potential incremental value for risk prediction in patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography. However, further external validation and standardization are required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42521849What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.