ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Benzoic acid versus salicylic acid efficacy in regulating growth, accumulation of secondary metabolites and NO
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSalicylic acid (SA) and benzoic acid (BA) are important phenolic regulators involved in plant growth and defense; however, their comparative roles in modulating growth and secondary metabolites production in leafy vegetables remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the influence of exogenous SA and BA on growth, mineral composition, and bioactive compound accumulation in Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris L. var. cicla).
methodsField experiments were conducted over two successive seasons of 2023/24 and 2024/25 to assess the influence of SA and BA on Swiss chard cv. Ruby Red. Plants were treated with SA and BA at 1, 2, and 3 mM, each alongside an untreated control. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. Beside the agronomic attributes, photosynthetic pigments, total phenols, total flavonoids, total antioxidant activity, total indoles, anthocyanin, nitrate, and mineral content were assayed.
resultsBoth SA and BA significantly improved growth parameters, mineral content, and secondary metabolites accumulation compared to the control. SA at 1 mM or BA 1 mM were the most effective treatments, showing the highest significant values of vegetative parameters, photosynthetic pigments, total phenolics, total flavonoids, total antioxidant activity, total indoles, anthocyanin, and mineral content. Further, BA 1 mM was the potent treatment for lowering leaf nitrate content, showing the lowest nitrate content, which was significantly lower than SA at 2 and 3 mM. Correlation analysis revealed strong positive relationships between growth parameters and secondary metabolites.
conclusionBA behaves influence similar to SA for enhancing leaves yield with higher efficacy in reducing nitrate content via enhancing the efficiency of photosynthetic pigments and regulating various secondary metabolites. Herein, BA at low concentration (1 mM) is a promising rate to be applied to obtain high yield with good quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.