ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2026
Global Prevalence of Self-Reported Alarm Features in the General Population and Among Individuals With Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction-Results From the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study.
Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundData on the global prevalence of alarm features in the general population and among individuals with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) are limited.
methodsWe analysed data from the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study to estimate the prevalence of fourteen self-reported alarm features in the global population and among individuals with Rome IV defined DGBI, including 54,127 participants from 26 countries. Differences between participants with and without DGBI were evaluated in a sample excluding those with self-reported organic gastrointestinal disease, using univariable logistic regression. Analyses were stratified by age (< 50 vs. ≥ 50 years).
resultsAlarm features were reported by 63.1% of participants aged < 50 years and 51.8% of those aged ≥ 50 years. Individual self-reported alarm features ranged from 0.9% to 18.3% in younger participants to 0.3%-13.3% in older participants. Haematemesis was the least frequently reported feature, while a major change in bowel movements was the most frequent in both age groups. Self-reported alarm features were more frequent among participants with than without DGBI (< 50 years: 75.3% vs. 50.7%; OR 3.0 [2.8-3.1]; ≥ 50 years: 67.5% vs. 38.8%; OR 3.3 [3.1-3.5]). Participants with DGBI were also more likely to report multiple alarm features. DISCUSSION: Self-reported alarm features are common in the general population and more prevalent among individuals with DGBI. These findings underscore the importance of interpreting alarm features within a broader clinical context rather than in isolation. Further studies are needed to clarify the diagnostic utility of alarm features in unselected populations, particularly among individuals with DGBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.