Evidence mapPaperPMID 42523013Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

ENHANCE (Tailored Intervention for Brain Health and Cognitive Enrichment for Cognitive Health), a Coach-Supported Digital Intervention for Dementia Prevention in Underserved Older Adults: Co-Design and Usability Study.

Clare Tsz Kiu Yu, Gill Livingston, Louise Allan, Richard Boczko, Sue Boex, Youngjun Cho, Kealan Forristal, Rachael Hunter, James Jamison, Fahima Khatun and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Clare Tsz Kiu YuDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7771-5838
Gill LivingstonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6741-5516
Louise AllanMedical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8912-4901
Richard BoczkoFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6948-8270
Sue BoexDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0238-5111
Youngjun ChoDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5695-0759
Kealan ForristalSocial, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5498-0006
Rachael HunterCentre for Applied Health Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7447-8934
James JamisonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6452-0561
Fahima KhatunUCL Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6135-8765
Carl LecksteinDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8363-5735
Louise MarstonDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9973-1131
Vrushti MehtaDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9267-7022
Naaheed MukadamDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8635-9521
Hee Kyung ParkSamsung Medical Center, Seoul, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6339-0059
Shi QiuDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8089-4428
Greta RaitDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7216-7294
Penny RapaportDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0479-6950
Joanne ReeveFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3184-7955
Longbing RenDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Shanghai Disabled Persons' Federation Key Laboratory of Intelligent Rehabilitation Assistive Devices and Technologies, Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Tongji University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2462-2421
Anne Gm SchilderUCL Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5496-4580
Aneesha SinghUCL Interaction Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0835-5802
Andrew SommerladDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8895-7055
Alanah SpillaneDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2429-8442
Liz SteedWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1926-3196
Michelle XuDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5893-2157
Kai YaoCentre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0549-3715
Ruan-Ching YuDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8081-5300
Sergi G CostafredaDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6914-086X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital multidomain interventions hold promise for dementia risk reduction; however, populations at higher dementia risk, including those experiencing socioeconomic and educational disadvantage, remain underrepresented in trials, and engagement with digital interventions often declines over time. Coproduction and blended models that combine digital tools with human support may improve reach, acceptability, usability, and sustained engagement. Designing interventions that are usable and acceptable for individuals facing structural, educational, or digital barriers (underserved groups) is therefore likely to produce solutions that are both accessible and scalable for the wider midlife and older adult population.

objectiveThis study aims to describe the coproduction process used to develop ENHANCE (Tailored Intervention for Brain Health and Cognitive Enrichment)-a coach-supported digital intervention targeting 10 modifiable dementia risk factors in older adults from underserved groups-and report key outputs and lessons learned for equitable digital prevention design.

methodsWe coproduced ENHANCE between July 2023 and February 2025 using a multistage development process guided by the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions and the Double Diamond design model. The person-based approach informed user-centered guiding principles (key design objectives), while behavior change content was operationalized using behavioral change theories. Coproduction followed 4 phases. The Discovery phase explored barriers to engagement with existing digital materials and identified candidate components for each dementia risk-factor module. The Define phase translated these insights into guiding principles and blueprints of each risk-factor module integrated with behavioral change components. The Design phase involved iterative co-production and usability testing of prototypes. The Delivery phase evaluated a high-fidelity prototype through a 1-week usability study with coaching support. Contributors included 162 research participants recruited from underserved community settings, 33 patient and public involvement contributors, and 4 human-computer interaction experts. Throughout development, coproduction focused on reducing literacy, digital confidence, and cultural barriers to maximize usability across diverse adult populations.

resultsCoproduction produced (1) evidence-informed module strategies for targeted dementia risk factors; (2) a set of guiding principles to ensure low-literacy, culturally relevant, and accessible content, supporting both equity of access and wider population usability; (3) a meadow-themed app integrating tailored check-ins, educational videos, cognitive training games, and in-app messaging; and (4) a structured coaching model, including onboarding, brief follow-up, and accompanying coaching manuals. Iterative testing and refinement improved navigation, simplified language, reduced text burden, and ensured the use of familiar and accessible game formats, resulting in a feasibility-ready prototype.

conclusionsENHANCE is a coproduced, coach-supported digital intervention designed to be accessible for underserved midlife and older adults at increased dementia risk, with design features to support accessibility, engagement, and scalability across the wider aging population. The development process illustrates how integrating coproduction with behavioral science and usability methods can support principled intervention design for equitable digital dementia prevention.

Indexed as

BrainCognitionDementiaAgedCognitive EnhancementDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleagingappbehavioral healthcognitive trainingcoproductiondementiaolder adultsparticipatory research

Identifiers

PMID42523013
PMCPMC13469833

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.