ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Absolute quantitative proteomics guides patient-stratified drug repurposing in clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a highly heterogeneous disease in which distinct molecular subtypes exhibit characteristic genomic, metabolic, and microenvironmental features that influence therapeutic response. Substantial inter-patient variability exists within each subtype, resulting in markedly different clinical outcomes even among tumours of the same histological category. Proteomics provides a direct readout of tumour biology and pathway activity, complementing genomic information and enabling the identification of patient-specific actionable vulnerabilities. We applied a Total Protein Approach (TPA)-based prescriptomics framework that integrates absolute quantitative proteomics with curated drug-target knowledge to nominate patient-specific drug-repurposing options, positioned as coadjuvants to the prevailing standard of care. Methods: Seventeen human kidney tissue specimens, seven clear cell RCC (ccRCC), five papillary RCC (pRCC), and five normal adjacent tissues (NAT), were retrieved from the publicly available PRIDE repository (PXD023296) and reanalysed by TPA-based absolute quantification applied to previously acquired label-free LC-MS/MS data. Differential expression analysis between each tumour subtype and NAT identified subtype-specific upregulated proteins, wich were intersected with Therapeutic Target Database (TTD) to nominate FDA-approved drugs targeting dysregulated proteins as candidate repurposing strategies. Results: ccRCC and pRCC produced distinct proteome-wide upregulation profiles consistent with their known biological drivers. TPA index stratification nominated bempedoic acid (ACLY inhibitor) and tipiracil hydrochloride (TYMP inhibitor) as patient-stratified candidates for ccRCC, and auranofin (TXNRD1 inhibitor), bempedoic acid, and mipomersen (APOB-directed antisense oligonucleotide) for pRCC. ACLY was the only top-priority target shared across both subtypes, pointing to a candidate cross-subtype metabolic vulnerability. Secondary candidates emerged from protein-protein interaction network analysis in both subtypes.. Conclusions: This study presents a quantitative proteomics framework for translating individual-patient proteomic dysregulation into coadjuvant drug-repurposing hypotheses across the principal RCC subtypes. By combining the TPA for absolute protein quantification with prescriptomics-guided drug-target mapping, we show that ccRCC and pRCC harbour distinct, individually stratifiable therapeutic vulnerabilities. These findings provide a proof-of-concept for proteomics-based treatment stratification in RCC and establish a scalable framework that, pending functional validation, could inform personalised therapeutic decision-making across RCC subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.