ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Methodological assessment of PDMS passive sampling for skin VOC collection across body sites.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is a non-invasive and versatile material often used for non-invasive collection of skin-emitted volatile organic compounds (VOCs), with potential applicability in acute and pre-critical care settings. However, most existing PDMS-based methodologies rely on extensive sample preparation and environmental control, limiting their feasibility in time-sensitive clinical contexts. Methods: We conducted a proof-of-concept pilot study in four healthy volunteers to evaluate whether a simplified skin-contact PDMS sampling procedure can capture detectable VOCs and preserve individual-level variation. PDMS strips were applied directly to the skin with minimal preparation, and collected VOCs were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Donor-associated variability was assessed using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, and variability in VOC detection was evaluated across body sites. Results: Skin-contact PDMS sampling detected 160 VOCs across four participants. The mean within-donor Bray-Curtis dissimilarity was 0.308, compared with a mean between-donor dissimilarity of 0.347. Preliminary permutation testing showed distinguishable donor profiles (p-value = 0.004). VOC detection variability differed across body sites, with lower coefficients of variation at the forehead, neck, and wrist than at the ankle. Conclusions: Under simplified sampling conditions, skin-contact PDMS captured individual-associated VOC profiles with lower within-donor variability than between-donor variability. These findings support the feasibility of PDMS-based skin VOC sampling in minimally controlled settings. Further validation in larger and clinically relevant cohorts is warranted to assess the utility of PDMS-sampled skin VOCs as potential biomarkers for early disease detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.