ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
The Earliest Impressions: A Systematic Review of Early-Life Exposures on Brain Structure and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prenatal and early postnatal life is a period of rapid brain growth, making the developing brain particularly susceptible to external influences. Adapting the biopsychosocial model of mental health and illness, this review provides a systematic overview of how biological, psychological, and social exposures from conception to age three critically converge to shape brain development and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Following a pre-registered protocol and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, 55 studies were included, primarily published in the past 15 years. Earlier studies focused predominantly on biological exposures, while more recent work has increasingly examined psychological exposures and, more rarely, social exposures. While each exposure exhibited its own pattern of brain alterations and neurodevelopmental changes, an overarching pattern emerged across the different components of the biopsychosocial model. Adverse biological exposures were consistently associated with delayed brain maturation as reflected by brain imaging measures. Adverse psychosocial exposures showed a more complex pattern of associations with both delayed and accelerated brain maturation. Crucially, adverse exposures, whether associated with delayed or accelerated brain maturation, were consistently associated with poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes, underscoring the necessity of considering both brain and behavior when estimating the impact of early exposures. We conclude that research into early-life exposures on brain maturation and neurodevelopmental outcomes is on the rise, but there is a great need for further investigation, in particular of psychological and social exposures. The interactions between exposures, the brain, and outcomes are highly complex, requiring assessment of both brain development and behavior together, ideally in within-subject longitudinal designs in future studies.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.