ArticleResearch square2026
Functional inertia reveals history-dependent organization of large-scale brain dynamics.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The brain does not process the present in isolation. Its responses are shaped by the accumulating weight of prior states, yet existing frameworks treat large-scale brain dynamics as sequences of transient configurations, leaving the constraining influence of history formally unspecified. Here we show that the brain possesses an intrinsic, representation-agnostic organizing constraint, the degree to which accumulated prior states resist ongoing reorganization, which we term functional inertia. Using an inertial state-space model replicated across two independent observational frameworks, we demonstrate that functional inertia operates coherently across three levels of brain organization: it structures activity into dynamical regimes, links these regimes to clinical and cognitive expression through a system-level inertial magnitude, and distributes across circuits in patterns that reconcile the longstanding coexistence of associative rigidity and sensory volatility in schizophrenia. Critically, removing the cumulative integration collapses this multilevel organization. Strikingly, the system-level inertial magnitude carries opposite cognitive signatures across diagnostic contexts, predicting better performance in healthy individuals but greater symptom severity in schizophrenia, reflecting context-dependent expression of a single constraint. These findings position functional inertia as a unifying, multilevel constraint on brain reorganization, recasting stability and volatility not as opposing properties but as context-dependent expressions of a single constraint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.