ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Coupled Cell-Intrinsic and Microenvironmental Heterogeneity Drives Divergent Trajectories in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Castration-resistant prostate cancer emerges from coupling between cell-intrinsic heterogeneity and microenvironmental constraints. Mechanistically dissecting this coupling, rather than either factor in isolation, is the central aim of this study. To systematically study the effect of intrinsic and extrinsic spatial axes on disease trajectories, we developed an integrated multiscale framework: a cellular signaling model (MHS) parameterized with TCGA genomic data from control, biochemical recurrence (BR), and treatment-resistant (TR) cohorts, coupled to a spatial agent-based model (ABM). Machine learning surrogates trained on the MHS model identified PTEN, MDM4, and AR as dominant intrinsic drivers, using SHAP-based feature ranking. Clinical validation via Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression across cBioPortal cohorts confirmed these rankings: AR alterations (median OS 20 vs. 86 months), PTEN loss (54 vs. 77 months), and MDM4 amplification (33 vs. 75 months) predicted poor overall survival outcomes independently. At the tissue scale, ABM simulations were run to study the effect of microenvironmental (cell-extrinsic) factors such as physical confinement, androgen uptake kinetics, and adhesion-motility strength, on disease progression. This spatiotemporal analysis revealed that identical genetic alterations produce varied selection outcomes depending on microenvironmental context. Extending this coupling logic to the individual patient level, we parameterized the MHS model using gene expression profiles from 14 patients in the EUREKA1 prospective registry. Patient-specific androgen sensitivity ratios, the ratio of net cell growth under high versus low testosterone, stratified patients by model-predicted androgen dependence without requiring longitudinal PSA observations and showed that PTEN deletion shifts the proliferative response toward androgen independence in a patient-specific magnitude set by the broader expression background. This provides a model-based route from genomic data at diagnosis to personalized prediction of ADT resistance risk. Together, these findings establish that CRPC emergence is an emergent property of the intrinsic-extrinsic coupling, that neither molecular nor spatial analyses in isolation can predict clinical trajectories, and that mechanistic integration of both is required for accurate patient stratification.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.