Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42523656›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2026

Guidelines for visual cognitive rehabilitation of visual information processing disorders (2025).

Yi Shao, Cong Zhang, Chun-Nan Zhang, Expert Workgroup of Guidelines for Visual Cognitive Rehabilitation of Visual Information Processing Disorders (2025); Ophthalmology & Optometry Branch of China Association for Ethnic Medicine; Ophthalmology Committee of International Association of Translational Medicine; Ophthalmology Committee of International Association of Intelligent Medicine; Intelligent Medicine Special Committee of China Medical Education Association; Chinese Visual Cognition Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yi ShaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Shanghai 200080, China.
Cong ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shapingba Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing University, Chongqing 400037, China.
Chun-Nan ZhangSoutheast Vision and Ophthalmology Institute, Fuzhou Southeast Eye Hospital, Fuzhou 350004, Fujian Province, China.
Expert Workgroup of Guidelines for Visual Cognitive Rehabilitation of Visual Information Processing Disorders (2025); Ophthalmology & Optometry Branch of China Association for Ethnic Medicine; Ophthalmology Committee of International Association of Translational Medicine; Ophthalmology Committee of International Association of Intelligent Medicine; Intelligent Medicine Special Committee of China Medical Education Association; Chinese Visual Cognition Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual information processing (VIP) is essential for perception and cognition. It enables the brain to acquire and integrate visual stimuli into coherent representations. Visual information processing disorder (VIPD) is characterized by impairments in visuospatial ability, visual analysis, and visuomotor integration. These deficits significantly affect daily activities, learning, and occupational performance. The etiology of these disorders is multifaceted, including developmental anomalies, traumatic brain injuries, ocular diseases, and surgical interventions. This condition involves multiple disciplines (ophthalmology, pediatrics, neurology, and rehabilitation), posing significant challenges for clinical diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation. Despite the growing international focus on these disorders, there remain considerable deficiencies in their diagnosis and treatment within China. Clinicians often have limited awareness of VIPD. Standardized diagnostic criteria are lacking, and rehabilitation approaches remain inconsistent. Visual abnormalities are often overlooked in pediatrics and neurology. In contrast, ophthalmology is limited in addressing disorders related to neurological dysfunction. In response to these challenges, this guide has been developed, drawing on the experiences of Europe and America and integrating local research and practice. It provides practical and systematic guidance for the diagnosis and management of VIPD. The objective is to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities, foster interdisciplinary collaboration, and improve patients' visual function and quality of life.

Indexed as

guidelinesrehabilitation therapyvisual cognitionvisual information processing disorder

Identifiers

PMID42523656
PMCPMC13407249

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.