ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Analysis of latent profiles and influencing factors of artificial intelligence anxiety among newly recruited nurses: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Determinants of Mobile Learning Behavioral Intention Usage Among Nurses: A Nexus of UTAUT2 Model and Information System Success Model.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the current status of artificial intelligence (AI) anxiety among newly recruited nurses, explore its latent categories and characteristics, and analyze related influencing factors, thereby providing a scientific basis for promoting the acceptance of AI technology among newly recruited nurses and enhancing the nursing workforce's adaptability to AI applications. Methods: Convenience sampling was used to select 715 newly recruited nurses from four Grade A tertiary hospitals in Liaoning, Shandong, and Jilin, China. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, the Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale, the Attitude Scale toward the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Nursing, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Latent profile analysis was conducted using Mplus 8.3 software to explore the categories and characteristics of AI anxiety among newly recruited nurses, and univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed using SPSS 26.0 software to investigate the influencing factors of different categories. Results: AI anxiety among newly recruited nurses was classified into three categories: low anxiety-technology acceptance (47.6%), moderate anxiety-ambivalent watch and wait (37.5%), and high anxiety-technology rejection (15.0%). Educational level, income level, experience with AI training, proficiency in AI technology, attitude toward AI, and self-efficacy were identified as significant predictors of the latent dimensions of AI anxiety among newly recruited nurses. Conclusion: Heterogeneity exists in AI anxiety among newly recruited nurses, suggesting that nursing managers should focus on the "high anxiety-technology rejection" group by providing targeted AI training and psychological support to enhance these nurses' acceptance and application of AI technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.