ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Perceived control and immersion in AI chatbot interaction: a psychological distance perspective.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigates how perceived control shapes immersion in AI chatbot interaction through psychological distance. Drawing on psychological distance theory, we distinguish perceived interaction control, defined as users' perceived control over conversational flow, from perceived content control, defined as users' perceived control over generated content. We further examine how these two forms of perceived control contribute to reducing temporal, spatial, and social psychological distance in AI chatbot interaction. Methods: Survey data were collected from 338 AI chatbot users and analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). PLS-SEM was used to examine the net effects among perceived control, psychological distance, and immersion, whereas fsQCA was used to identify alternative configurational pathways leading to high immersion. Results: The results show that perceived interaction control positively predicts perceived content control and contributes to reducing all three dimensions of psychological distance. Perceived content control further strengthens the reduction of temporal, spatial, and social psychological distance. Reduced temporal and social psychological distance are positively associated with immersion, whereas reduced spatial distance has no significant effect. The fsQCA results reveal multiple sufficient pathways to high immersion. Discussion: These findings extend psychological distance theory to the context of conversational AI and highlight perceived control as a key mechanism underlying immersive chatbot experiences. By distinguishing perceived interaction control from perceived content control, this study provides a more nuanced explanation of how users become immersed in AI chatbot interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.