ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2026
Systematic genomic Mendelian randomization profiling of early molecular markers of optic atrophy.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo identify early molecular diagnostic biomarkers for optic atrophy (OPA) and explore potential mechanisms mediated by proteins.
methodsGene expression data was sourced from eQTLGen (31 684 samples; 19 960 genes). The OPA discovery cohort came from FinnGen (629 cases; 496 621 controls); the validation cohort came from the genome-wide association studies (GWAS) catalog (58 cases; 496 621 controls). Protein data for mediation analysis was obtained from the deCODE Genetics consortium (35 559 samples; 4907 proteins). Causal estimates were derived using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR). Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was the primary analysis method. Sensitivity analyses included MR-Egger intercept, Cochran's
resultsMulti-cohort validation revealed that increased expression levels of the SEC61A2 and THNSL2 were causally associated with an elevated risk of OPA. Furthermore, we identified 386 genes potentially associated with OPA. Hormone secretion and immune-related pathways were found to play significant roles in OPA pathogenesis. Mediation analysis indicated that Upper zone of growth plate and cartilage matrix associated (UCMA) potentially mediates the effect of SEC61A2 in increasing OPA risk.
conclusionSEC61A2 and THNSL2 may serve as early diagnostic biomarkers for OPA. Additionally, SEC61A2 likely increases OPA risk through UCMA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.