Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42523801›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026

AI literacy in undergraduate medical education: a competency-based interpretive framework for curriculum and assessment.

Chao Fu, Jingjing Li, Haoyi Fan, Ruihang Ren, Kefei Cui, Yan Zhang, Jing Yu, Jing Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chao FuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jingjing LiDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Haoyi FanSchool of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Ruihang RenDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Kefei CuiDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jing YuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a core educational concern in undergraduate medical education as AI-enabled tools increasingly shape clinical workflows, learning environments, and patient care. The challenge is no longer simply whether AI should be included in the curriculum, but how AI literacy should be bounded for undergraduate learners and translated into teachable, observable, and assessable educational outcomes. This focused conceptual narrative review synthesized literature on AI literacy and related constructs in undergraduate medical education, using a structured search and interpretive synthesis with competency-based medical education (CBME) as an interpretive lens. PubMed and ERIC were searched for English-language literature from 1 January 2020 to 15 April 2026. Local screening records identified 94 standardized bibliography records, 66 records screened after deduplication, 40 full-text reports assessed, and 30 publications contributing to the final synthesis. Five recurring domains were identified: Foundational AI knowledge; applied clinical interpretation and use; data literacy and critical appraisal; ethics, law, and professional responsibility; and human-AI collaboration and professional formation. Through a CBME lens, these domains can be translated into learning outcomes, contextualized tasks, observable performances, and programmatic assessment evidence. The literature most strongly supports conceptual clarification, domain identification, and curricular translation, whereas evidence for longitudinal development, observable performance, and validated undergraduate assessment remains limited. The proposed framework, examples, milestones, and rubric anchors are synthesis-informed design propositions that require empirical validation before high-stakes use.

Indexed as

AI literacycompetency-based medical educationcurriculum developmentmedical educationprogrammatic assessmentundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID42523801
PMCPMC13407777

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.