ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Aligning preclinical AML models with immunotherapy development: principles for model selection.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have revealed critical gaps in selection of appropriate preclinical models. Conventional cytotoxic and targeted therapies could be tested in relatively straightforward systems. Immunotherapies are inherently distinct from conventional therapies, as their activity is shaped by dynamic, context-dependent interactions between leukemic cells, immune effectors, and the bone marrow microenvironment that are difficult to replicate outside the patient. Failure to recapitulate these interactions may limit the clinical translatability of promising results. Recognizing these shortcomings, the field has moved through several generations of modeling platforms. Existing platforms capture distinct but incomplete aspects of AML biology:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.