ArticleSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2026
Influence of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Preprocessing Pipelines on the Accuracy of Schizophrenia Classification Using Machine Learning Methods.
Article in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Materials and Methods: The study used fMRI data from 72 subjects acquired on a Siemens Magnetom Verio 3T MRI scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Germany) at the National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute". Seven different preprocessing pipelines were used on each dataset. Feature vectors for classification were constructed from each preprocessed dataset. We applied the following three algorithms for feature vector construction: ReHo, FCM, and FHR. Classification was performed using 15 machine learning methods from the scikit-learn package for each feature set and each preprocessing pipeline. The final accuracy was determined as the maximum accuracy among all machine learning methods. Results: No single optimal preprocessing pipeline for all feature vector construction algorithms was found. Smoothing increased accuracy for the voxel metrics ReHo and FHR, but not for the regional metric FCM. Spatial smoothing was the only preprocessing step that affected classification accuracy for the FHR method. The FHR feature set without smoothing demonstrated accuracy close to chance level. The steps of frequency filtering and median normalization substantially increased the accuracy for both the ReHo and FCM methods, both with and without smoothing. The steps of inhomogeneity correction and slice timing correction did not increase accuracy for the FCM feature set but did improve it by several percent for the ReHo feature set. Application of ICA filtering changed accuracy within a range of 5%, in either a positive or negative direction. Conclusion: Based on the obtained results, the following recommendations can be given for fMRI data preprocessing pipelines for binary classification of subjects into schizophrenia patients and healthy controls using machine learning methods and taking into account the feature vector construction algorithm. The most suitable for the ReHo metric pipeline includes motion correction, normalization, inhomogeneity correction, slice timing correction, frequency filtering, median normalization, and spatial smoothing. The most suitable for the FCM metric pipeline includes motion correction, normalization, inhomogeneity correction, slice timing correction, frequency filtering, and median normalization. Spatial smoothing is the most important factor for the FHR metric. The ICA filtering step does not provide a clear benefit and should therefore be applied with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.