Evidence mapPaperPMID 42524293Full record

ArticleCardiology research2026

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Abdullah Ghazi Aljohani, Osamah Omar Alturki, Ghaida Yahya Alahmari, Abdulrahman Thumayl Al-Shammari, Muqrin Abdullah Alharbi, Asmaa Esam Saeed Ali, Ali Saleh AlYounis, Abdulkarim Abdurrahman Mohammed Alshehri, Fahad Ali Hussain Alqahtani, Nourhan Sulaiman Basyouni and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Abdullah Ghazi AljohaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Osamah Omar AlturkiKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ghaida Yahya AlahmariDepartment of Internal Medicine, Batterjee Medical College, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman Thumayl Al-ShammariFaculty of Medicine, University of Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Muqrin Abdullah AlharbiFaculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt.
Asmaa Esam Saeed AliFaculty of Medicine, University of Sana'a, Saudi Arabia.
Ali Saleh AlYounisDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, King Faisal General Hospital, Al Ahsa Health Cluster, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulkarim Abdurrahman Mohammed AlshehriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Billasmar General Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad Ali Hussain AlqahtaniMedical Services - MOI, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Nourhan Sulaiman BasyouniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Al Imam Abdulrahman Alfaisal Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Noor AlmutairiCollege of Medicine and Surgery, Majmaah University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Refal Hamad JamjoomKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mansour Mohammed Abdullah AlahmariDepartment of Internal Medicine, Al Imam Abdulrahman Alfaisal Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed SobhyFaculty of Medicine, Kafr Elsheikh University, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are at high risk of thrombotic events and exhibit reduced responsiveness to conventional antiplatelet therapy. While newer P2Y12 inhibitors such as ticagrelor and prasugrel provide more potent platelet inhibition, the optimal therapeutic strategy in this population remains uncertain. Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases were searched through April 2026 to identify RCTs comparing clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, and placebo in patients with DM and CAD receiving background aspirin therapy. Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), while safety outcomes included major bleeding. Results: Seventeen RCTs, including 40,919 patients, were identified, with 15 trials included in the quantitative synthesis. Compared with placebo, prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with significant reductions in MACEs, whereas clopidogrel showed no significant benefit. No significant differences were observed in cardiovascular or all-cause mortality across treatment strategies. Prasugrel was associated with a lower risk of myocardial infarction, while ticagrelor was associated with a lower risk of stroke. Both agents increased major bleeding versus placebo, and ticagrelor was also associated with a higher risk of dyspnea. Ranking analysis suggested that prasugrel was the most effective strategy for ischemic outcomes, whereas placebo was the safest strategy overall. Conclusions: In patients with DM and CAD, prasugrel and ticagrelor provide superior protection against ischemic events compared with clopidogrel but are associated with an increased bleeding risk compared with placebo. Prasugrel appears to offer the greatest overall efficacy, while ticagrelor shows a distinct benefit in stroke prevention. These findings support individualized antiplatelet strategies that balance ischemic and bleeding risks in this high-risk population.

Indexed as

Coronary artery diseaseDiabetes mellitusPrasugrelTicagrelor

Identifiers

PMID42524293
PMCPMC13411678

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.