Evidence mapPaperPMID 42524501Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Design and Early Implementation Outcomes of a Mobile Health-Enabled Social Support Intervention for Adults Living With HIV and Type 2 Diabetes in Uganda.

Gerald Kizza, Angella Musiimenta, William Wasswa, Richard Kimera, Wilson Tumuhimbise

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gerald KizzaComputer Science, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, UGA.
Angella MusiimentaResearch and Innovations, Angels Compassion, Mbarara, UGA.
William WasswaBiomedical Sciences and Engineering, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, UGA.
Richard KimeraInformation Technology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, UGA.
Wilson TumuhimbiseInformation Technology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, UGA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdults living with HIV and type 2 diabetes experience complex treatment demands that affect medication-taking, clinic attendance, privacy, social support, and engagement with care. Mobile health (mHealth)-enabled social support may help reduce treatment burden, but such interventions need to fit patients' everyday realities, phone access, trusted support networks, and clinic workflow.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe the user-centered design (UCD) mechanisms of an mHealth-enabled social support intervention for adults living with HIV and type 2 diabetes in Uganda and assess perceived and self-reported early implementation outcomes, including acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness, after one month of use.

methodsThis mixed-methods formative study was conducted among 64 purposively selected participants from the HIV and diabetes clinics at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH), including 39 adults living with HIV and type 2 diabetes, 20 nominated social supporters, and five healthcare workers. Participants were oriented to an Mhealth-enabled social support intervention composed of short message service (SMS) reminders, educational messages, social supporter SMS prompts, discreet messaging, server-supported message routing, and clinic linkage. Patients used the intervention for one month. Post-trial interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), brief feedback forms, observation notes, and intervention-use records were used to assess acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, concerns, social support activation, and design refinements. Interview and focus group questions were informed by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), and refinements followed a UCD approach. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically using NVivo, while quantitative intervention-use records and feedback responses were analyzed in Stata and summarized using frequencies, percentages, and counts.

resultsParticipants perceived the intervention as useful for supporting medication-taking, clinic appointment preparation, communication with nominated social supporters, and a sense of being supported beyond the clinic. During the one-month trial, 1,092 SMS medication reminders, 74 appointment reminders, 312 educational or supportive messages, and 280 social supporter SMS prompts were delivered. Privacy-sensitive wording was strongly preferred because of the fear of unintended HIV status disclosure. The intervention was considered feasible because it used familiar channels, including SMS, voice calls, and simple app functions, although shared phone use, airtime costs, charging problems, network interruptions, language barriers, and possible clinic workload remained concerns. Participants considered the intervention appropriate because it addressed both HIV and diabetes, enabled patient-controlled social support, protected privacy, and fit existing social and clinical support practices.

conclusionA privacy-sensitive, low-burden intervention that combines reminders, patient-controlled supporter prompts, short educational messages, and clinic linkage could support medication-taking and care coordination for patients managing both conditions. Further implementation research is needed to refine the intervention and assess longer-term adoption, fidelity, sustainability, and preliminary impact.

Indexed as

digital healthhivimplementation outcomesmedication adherencemobile healthmultimorbiditysocial supporttreatment burdentype 2 diabetesuganda

Identifiers

PMID42524501
PMCPMC13412202

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.