ReviewBJR open2026
Imaging-based detection and prediction of radiation-induced cardiac toxicity: a narrative review.
Review in BJR open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) can lead to late-onset cardiac toxicity, especially in patients receiving treatment for breast, thoracic, or hematologic malignancies. Early identification of subclinical cardiac injury is essential to guide surveillance and intervention strategies. This narrative review synthesizes imaging-based evidence published between 2014 and 2025 on the detection and prediction of RT-induced cardiac toxicity. We screened 1535 studies and included 78 studies that employed echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission CT (SPECT), cardiac CT, or multimodal approaches. Echocardiographic strain imaging, particularly global longitudinal strain (GLS), consistently identified early subclinical dysfunction. CMR offered spatial and tissue-level characterization of myocardial fibrosis and inflammation, while PET/SPECT revealed perfusion and metabolic changes in irradiated myocardium. CT-based methods such as coronary artery calcium scoring and coronary CT angiography detected subclinical atherosclerosis with dose correlations. Several predictive models integrating imaging, dose, and clinical data demonstrated strong performance in identifying high-risk patients. Despite encouraging results from such models, variability in timing and endpoint selection limits clinical adoption. Standardized imaging protocols and prospective validation of predictive models are urgently needed. Imaging biomarkers may help tailor follow-up strategies to individual risk and guide the design of future cardio-oncology trials and radiation treatment planning strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.