ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026
Resource-Efficient Quantum Algorithms for Selected Hamiltonian Subspace Diagonalization.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resource-Efficient Quantum Algorithms for Selected Hamiltonian Subspace Diagonalization.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantum algorithms for selecting a subspace of Hamiltonians to diagonalize have emerged as a promising alternative to variational algorithms in the NISQ era. So far, such algorithms, which include the quantum selected configuration interaction (QSCI) and sample-based quantum diagonalization (SQD), have been formulated in second quantization within Fock space, which leads to inefficient usage of qubit resources. We introduce the first QSCI algorithm developed in the CI-matrix (CIM) framework, which is known to have optimal qubit scaling of exactly⌈log2(N)⌉, where N is the size of the CIM. In addition, we introduce a novel single-bit flip error mitigation which comes at the overhead of a single qubit and we combine this with a stochastic approximate Trotterization evolution adapted from qDRIFT. Simulating benchmark N2 and naphthalene molecules on quantum hardware, our results achieved similar accuracy as SQD methods but with significantly less quantum resources. However, our CIM-QSCI algorithm and SQD methods could not match the performance of classical heat-bath CI (HCI) for the same task. Hence, we introduce an augmented version of QSCI called quantum selected heat-bath CI (QSHCI). This variant replaces classical heat-bath sampling with quantum sampling from QSCI to achieve performance comparable to HCI. We note that a current drawback of our approach is the preprocessing cost of O(N2logN)for constructing the CIM and performing the Pauli decomposition. This can be further improved by considering efficient CIM access models for the stochastic Trotter evolution.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.