Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42524829›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026

Reproducibility of VF, OCT, and OCTA in Glaucoma: A Prospective Multi-Visit Study.

Qiong Xu, Damon Wong, Bingyao Tan, Charmaine Shi Min Lim, Qinglan Hu, Kai Lin Wong, Nuriin Athirah Binte Mohd Zain, Rahat Husain, Tina Wong, Tin Aung and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Qiong XuSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Damon WongSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Bingyao TanSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Charmaine Shi Min LimSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Qinglan HuSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Kai Lin WongSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Nuriin Athirah Binte Mohd ZainSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Rahat HusainSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Tina WongSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Tin AungSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Leopold SchmettererSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Jacqueline ChuaSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS L30 AI172024NIAID NIH HHS L40 AI172024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To quantify the reproducibility of visual field (VF), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCT angiography (OCTA) metrics in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: Thirty-eight POAG patients completed five visits over three months without treatment changes. VF, OCT, and OCTA were obtained. Eyes were classified as mild (mean deviation [MD] > -6 dB) or moderate-to-advanced (MD ≤ -6 dB). Reproducibility was assessed using 95% tolerance limits (TL), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and coefficient of variation (CoV). Mixed-effects models identified factors associated with variability. Results: Thirty-eight participants (age 67 ± 9 years) included 56 mild (74%) and 20 moderate-to-advanced (26%) eyes. VF metrics demonstrated severity-dependent increases in variability, with MD TL widening from ±2 to ±4 dB, ICC decreasing from 0.95 to 0.75, and CoV increasing from 16% to 26%. OCTA metrics also showed severity-related variability, particularly for peripapillary perfusion density (CoV 5% to 9%), whereas macular OCTA parameters showed smaller changes (CoV 1% to 2%). OCT structural measures remained stable across severity stages (peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer [pRNFL] and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer [mGCIPL] CoV ∼2%). Worse MD predicted greater variability in VF and OCTA metrics (all P ≤ 0.046), whereas older age, longer axial length, and false-negative rate were associated with greater MD variability (all P ≤ 0.022). Conclusions: VF and OCTA metrics showed severity-dependent variability, whereas OCT structural measures remained stable across severity stages. These findings support modality- and severity-specific thresholds for glaucoma progression. Translational Relevance: This study helps clinicians better distinguish true glaucoma progression from normal test variability across VF, OCT, and OCTA measurements.

Indexed as

Fluorescein AngiographyGlaucoma, Open-AngleTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual FieldsAgedFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRetinal Ganglion CellsVisual Field Tests

Identifiers

PMID42524829
PMCPMC13426858

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.