Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42524873›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology (Reading, England)2026

Microbial quorum sensing signals, symbiosis, secrets and sabotage.

Miguel Cámara, George P C Salmond, Paul Williams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology (Reading, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miguel CámaraNational Biofilms Innovation Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
George P C SalmondDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QW, UK.
Paul WilliamsNational Biofilms Innovation Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria exhibit sophisticated forms of multicellularity by coordinating the activities of individual cells with respect to behaviours such as symbiosis, conjugation, competence, swarming, secondary metabolite production, biofilm formation, growth inhibition, niche adaptation and virulence. Apart from direct cell-cell contact, the synthesis, release and perception of small diffusible chemicals acting as inter-cellular signals offer the most obvious mechanism for bacterial cell populations to synchronize their behaviour. Such cell-cell communication (quorum sensing) offers a unique framework for understanding how bacteria convert chemical information into coordinated group behaviours. It is deeply influenced by ecology, host interactions, chemical diversity and spatial architecture. Despite much progress, many fundamental questions remain unresolved, especially in natural, polymicrobial and host-associated environments. Here, we summarize our current understanding of bacterial cell-cell communication and main knowledge gaps and highlight examples of translational opportunities.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaQuorum SensingSymbiosisBiofilmsSignal Transductionautoinducercell-cell signallingintercellular signallingpolymicrobial interactionsquorum quenchingquorum sensing

Identifiers

PMID42524873
PMCPMC13419125

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.