SynthesisArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2026
Impact of Catheter Ablation on LVEF in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a condition that frequently affects patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and is associated with worsening left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and unfavorable clinical outcomes. Catheter ablation has been proposed as a strategy to restore sinus rhythm; however, its effects on LVEF remain heterogeneous in the literature. To evaluate the impact of catheter ablation, compared with medical therapy, on LVEF in patients with AF and HFrEF. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was improvement in LVEF, while secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and hospitalizations due to heart failure. Other exploratory outcomes were also considered. The included randomized clinical trials demonstrated improvement in LVEF among patients undergoing catheter ablation compared with those receiving medical therapy. In the CAMERA-MRI study, an absolute increase of 18.3% in LVEF was observed after six months. In the CASTLE-AF trial, catheter ablation was also associated with a lower incidence of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalizations. In the absence of a meta-analysis, no quantitative synthesis of the effects was performed. The available evidence from individual randomized trials suggests that catheter ablation may be associated with improvement in LVEF and more favorable clinical outcomes in patients with AF and HFrEF. However, given the lack of quantitative synthesis, these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.