ArticleGeroScience2026
Sensory impairment, epigenetic ageing, and later-life functional decline and mortality in older adults.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory impairment (SI) and accelerated epigenetic aging are both linked to later-life vulnerability, yet their joint value for risk stratification remains poorly understood. We investigated whether the co-occurrence of sensory deficits and accelerated epigenetic aging identifies older adults at heightened risk of functional decline and mortality. We analyzed data from 2,395 participants in the 2016 wave of the Health and Retirement Study with valid DNA methylation (DNAm) and sensory data. Epigenetic aging was assessed using GrimAgeAccel and methylation Pace of Aging (MPOA). Sensory phenotypes were categorized as no impairment, hearing impairment only, vision impairment only, and dual sensory impairment (DSI). Primary outcomes included subsequent mobility worsening, ADL/IADL worsening, and all-cause mortality. Cross-sectionally, vision impairment only and DSI were associated with higher GrimAgeAccel in demographic- and socioeconomic-adjusted models, but these associations were attenuated after further adjustment for lifestyle and health burden. In joint analyses, participants with both sensory impairment and high GrimAgeAccel had the highest risks of mobility worsening (OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.35-2.72), ADL/IADL worsening (OR = 2.85, 95% CI 1.96-4.14), and mortality (HR = 5.77, 95% CI 3.60-9.23), compared with the low-risk reference group. These associations remained evident in participants who were functionally intact at baseline. Sensory impairment and accelerated GrimAgeAccel jointly identified older adults at elevated risk of subsequent functional decline and mortality. These findings support a risk-stratification framework integrating clinically accessible sensory assessment with DNAm-based biological ageing measures, although formal evidence for biological interaction was limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42525180What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.